Security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR): Which solution is best?

Today, security teams are just beginning to realize the benefits of automation and orchestration. As a result, many security vendors are turning to security automation, orchestration and response (SOAR) platforms and the unique capabilities they can offer. However, choosing the right solution is not always easy, and there are many factors that business leaders must consider.

More than 540,000 professionals use Peerspot research to inform their purchasing decisions. Its most recent paper looks at the highest-rated SOAR vendors, profiles each one and evaluates what they can offer the enterprise.

Here is a breakdown of the major players currently active in the market:

CRITICALSTART

Average Rating: 9.3

Top Comparison: Arctic Wolf AWN CyberSOC

Overview: Stress alerting is prevented by using the Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) along with the industry-leading Trusted Behavior Registry, which eliminates false positives in size.

Exabeam Fusion SEAM

Average Rating: 7.7

Top Comparison: Splunk

Overview: A cloud-delivered solution that enables businesses to use turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response, as well as collecting, searching, and enhancing data from anywhere using market-leading behavior analytics.

Fortinet FortiSOAR

Average Rating: 7.0

Top Comparison: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview: Resolved some of the biggest challenges facing cybersecurity teams today. Allowing SOC teams to create a custom automated framework that brings together all of their organization’s tools unifies operations, eliminates alert stress and reduces context switching.

IBM Resilient

Average Rating: 7.5

Top Comparison: Splunk Phantom

Overview: Quickly and easily integrates with an organization’s current security and IT investments. This makes security alerts immediately actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Average Rating: 7.4

Top Comparison: McAfee MVISION ePO

Overview: The most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, the solution makes risk management and compliance simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee MVISION ePO

Average Rating: 8.5

Top Comparison: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview: Cloud-based security management that eliminates the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so that businesses can focus on monitoring their endpoints and mobile devices.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Average Rating: 8.6

Top Comparison: Splunk Phantom

Overview: Delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers optimize the entire life cycle of the incident while automatically documenting and journaling all evidence.

ServiceNow Security Operations

Average Rating: 9.0

Top Comparison: Splunk Phantom

Overview: An enterprise security response engine that offers security incident response, vulnerability response, and threat intelligence. It is built on the smart workflows, automation, orchestration, and deep IT connectivity of the ServiceNow platform.

Simplify

Average Rating: 10

Top Comparison: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview: From case creation, through investigation to remediation-it provides an intuitive, cloud-native workbench of security operations that teams seek to effectively respond to scale.

Splunk Platform

Average Rating: 7.8

Top Comparison: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Overview: It allows teams to work smarter by performing automated actions on their security infrastructure in seconds, compared to hours or more if done manually.

IDGConnect_peerspot_SOAR_downloadbutton_2100x912 IDG Connect

#Security #orchestration #automation #response #SOAR #solution #Source Link #Security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR): Which solution is best?

Leave a Comment